@gsuberland I’m sorry HOW MUCH CACHE? And I thought Intel was bad for just strapping more cache on the side to make it go faster. Must be a LOT of terrible performance they’re lying about under it.
@jpm it's got 192 cores per CPU, so it's not quite as insane as it sounds
@gsuberland oh that’s ok then, ~2.5MB per core. With that many cores, it must be starved for I/O, so probably targeting CPU+memory constrained workloads