@zeh @neuroexception Perhaps to some extent, but at some point the entire stack your implementation is built upon will be "the old way of doing it". I find this very useful to limit how "perfect" I feel I need to be in my implementation.
That said, that's my experience as a perfectionist.
@jmarion
right, i agree. and when confronted with those decisions of "good enough" vs "naack let's code for these use cases too" we get skewed because we know it is hard to iterate on what we have now, that it is hard for others to pick up this code we have and make it better. so we go for another round of grind instead
@neuroexception
@zeh @neuroexception I feel like keeping "what we have now" as minimal as possible helps in allowing yourself to pivot to an unknown direction in the future.
In addition, being able to help others get up to speed with your problem in the future should require as little as possible in order to drive momentum in your effort.
@jmarion @zeh @neuroexception The good old "do one thing and do it well" instead of hammering everything in just one role 😁
@marco_m_aus_f @zeh @neuroexception The *nix philosophies will resonate for generations in computing. We owe all of what we have today to those early pioneers 🙏
